The news of the day concerning Oshkosh storm water management (SWM) is that the city is planning to build a 60 foot X 60 foot pumping station along the shoreline in Menominee Park. Hadn't heard of this plan until recent? That's because no such plan existed.
What about inclusion in the city's comprehensive plan? Nope - not there either.
Well, this is the park - What about the parks plan? Not there.
Why does it seem like this just came out of no where, despite being something that you'd think would be part of a much larger, comprehensive plan? Because it didn't exist in any sort of long-term planning. Actually, it seems that comprehensive planning doesn't exist concerning SWM in the city.
Sure, you might find a watershed map or a listing of scattered ideas of what could be done. You will also locate at least one in-depth study of a watershed area. However, none of these provide the needed comprehensive approach that produces resident buy-in and sustainable water management practices that together improve water quality while reducing flood issues.
According to the EPA, effective municipal SWM programs address the following key components:
- Public education and outreach
- Public involvement
- Illicit discharge detection and elimination
- Construction Site Runoff Control
- Post-Construction Runoff Control
- Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping
(for more information on "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Municipal Stormwater Programs", visit
http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/region3_factsheet_swmp.pdf)
Maybe the lack of an up-front, active community education component would explain the ignorance demonstrated by golf course neighbors and others who are convinced that a retention pond will end up being a garbage bin that annually pours garbage into their basements. New subdivisions across the country sell their real estate water "water front" features, complete with a native-flowered walking path along their retention pond. The pic below is a small, well landscaped retention pond.

Maybe if the city actively involved residents in the planning process from the beginning, the planners would recognize that aesthetics plays as important of a part to retention ponds and diversion efforts as does engineering.
Further, while a big goal of this all is to avoid the mass flooding that plagued Oshkosh in 2008, the real goal of such programming and the reason why the city, county, region, state, and Us government have all required or strongly encouraged storm water management programming is to ensure that our community, and others across the state and country, have access to safe water for drinking and for other essential environmental purposes. The city has done little to promote environmentally sustainable initiatives that improve water quality, such as provided
here and
here.
One thing is clear concerning the Menominee Park Pump Station - the installation of a large pump station at Menominee park that facilitates the dumping of unfiltered storm water (including household chemicals, street pollution, fertilizers, etc) into the lake while removing green space is not only unsustainable, it goes against what the residents of Oshkosh and the city themselves have said they support:
- Vision Oshkosh report in which respondents overwhelming supported the implementation of sustainable design and sustainable practices. According to the report recommendations, "
Develop surface-runoff policies and plans that require diversion and collection of water to natural drainage and filtration areas" (Vision Oshkosh pg 59)
- Resident survey component of the Oshkosh Comprehensive Plan
- "respondents identified our water resources as the most important asset to the city. Protection of both the quality and quantity of water is critical"- It goes against what city has said they support - that is, in their comprehensive plan:
"Oshkosh will protect the city’s natural and environmentally sensitive resources. We will work cooperatively with other local units of government and agencies to protect these resources. The community will be educated on the value of these resources" (Natural Resource Vision pg 172)
Conclusion: At some point, the city is going to need to move beyond reactionary policies that are detrimental to the future sustainability of the city, and instead initiate a new, comprehensive approach to the SWM issue. So long as residents are not involved from the start, and so long as a real emphasis on public relations and community education is missing, we are going to have the loud and angry NIMBYs (not in my back yarders) opposing everything with the city resorting to less effective, unsustainable last-resort options. And such efforts are going to appear to the residents of the community that they are planned as well as the weather - or, in other words, not planned at all. In the last two weeks, I've had 3 individuals state that the city is simply locating the residents or area with the least amount of clout and proceeding there with their efforts. While I hold out that this isn't the case, the point it clear - people are not being educated concerning this significant matter.
.The pumping station is a bad idea. But if you're going to move ahead with it, you might as well lessen the negative impacts of it by attempting to incorporate some level of filtration, incorporating energy-generating components to offset on-going energy and environmental costs, and you had better get going on that Miller's Bay water management plan, because redirecting huge quantities of polluted water fortified with yard fertilizers and chemicals is only going to exponentially facilitate the hazardous algae blooms and other water quality problems.